TV NEWS; CRITICAL EVALUATION

Finally, we have come to the end of another project and it is time to reflect on what went well and what could have been improved on. With this project i was a little bit aphrenrsive because it was a group project again, working with the same people as i did on the last one i wanted to make sure that anything that went wrong last time we didn't do again.

What Went Well

-I think the first thing that went was was working in a group. In comparison to last time working in a group, i think we were all clear on what we wanted to do and how we wanted to do it. We knew first off that we needed to communicate more and understand what roles people wanted to take on. This time, Katie wanted to get more involved in actual editing rather than just graphics, so we kept all the files and edited from her laptop, this i think worked better, we all contributed to editing in some way from her laptop rather than it being left to one person. Also, Laura wanted to get more involved with the camera work, so on the live shoot with Rosie and Joel, Laura was on 2nd camera; the more complex one that involved sticking on a close up shot of Rosie. I wanted to get more involved with editing, the post production side and i think i achieved that in some way. One of my strengths i think is taking an idea someone gives me and putting it into practice; therefore after getting feedback from our rough and fine cut tutorials i felt like i had more of an idea of what i wanted to edit, i sat with Katie and together we rearranged the timeline and put more GVs in on both occasions after our tutorials. 

-A strength of our actual project i think was the live aspect of the package. We filmed using two cameras, something i had suggested because i believed though it was a live, we could still use a variety of shots and make it look very professional with good coverage. I thought we needed one camera to stay on a close up of Rosie because she was our main subject, and then the other camera Katie decided to use a wide shot to illustrate both of them talking. I also came up with the idea for Joel to switch looking cameras on his last link to close the programme; something id seen and researched in programmes before and i thought would work well. Part of this as well that was really good was the fact Rosie was such a good contact; she was an expert and gave us great answers and content, this was down to Laura for finding her. 

-The whole branding of our project was really good; we had a good colour arrangement and everything linked, right from the social media pages created by Laura and the website which was created by Aimee. This was down to the knowledge of adobe after effects that Aimee and Katie had, Aimee created our logo as well as an animation of it which i think really set our project aside and gave it a definite professional look. I didn't get too involved in the graphics side of it; i enjoy more the pre production organisational stuff and was trying to get more involved with actual editing - this is something i think i would like to get more involved in in the future. 

-Lastly, i think our last strength was taking feedback from Helen and putting it into practice. From both our rough cut and fine cut tutorial sessions we recorded what Helen said and made sure to put in place what she had told us. For example, we completed changed our introduction, i wrote out a huge page of voiceovers and Aimee arranged for Joel to meet with us to record them, this enabled us to still put out the information we needed to say to the audience, but in a more simplified way. We really used the valuable feedback from Helen in  a way to completely improve our project and highly believe we were successful for that. 

What we could improve on

-Something we needed to watch out on was framing, we needed to make sure that in the midst of all of our filming we make sure there was nothing in frame. For example on the live, Rosie's sound pack was in shot in the background and we didn't notice.

-Also, i think we needed to come up with an idea quicker than what we did, it took us so long to decide on an actual idea that our research was delayed. At first we all came up with our own individual idea; mine revolving around the advertising of Christmas becoming earlier and earlier every year. We needed to come up with an idea that was different; originally wanting to go down the halloween route but realising that many other groups also wanted to do this. Finally Katie Aimee and Laura expanded on my christmas idea, pairing it with their idea of debt and credit. I think because we came up with this idea so late we didn't have as long to do all of the research and we also wanted to film ASAP because we were aware we didn't have long to edit, and with the graphic ideas we had in mind, we wanted to make sure we had as much time to edit as possible.

-We needed to plan more sequencing and GVS. Especially with the package involving Kerri, i think we should have planned more sequencing to cover the cuts, because when we were editing we found we quick ran out of GVs to cover the cuts and needed to film last minute other ones, which although that worked fine, it just wasn't ideal. 

-Lastly i think we needed to be more prepared with our audio. We planned our voice overs last minute so we had to film using a DSLR; which wasn't good in comparison to the clip mic we used for the other ones. 

Overall

Overall i really enjoyed this project, i liked the topic and had quite an interest in it. I think i had a really good amount of contribution to the project which included calling up organisations such as Citizens advice trying to find out some more information, as well as writing the voiceovers and helping out with editing somewhat. Something  new in this project was bringing in external people and interviewing them, i enjoyed this part as well as i think i was quite confident around them, i introduced myself and the rest of the group and i took the lead on making the guests feel welcome and up to speed with what they would be doing with us. I thought that would be best as the more comfortable they felt, the better content they would give us. The video itself i think was really successful, as a group we all collaborated well and in the end i think we all put in equal effort, equal contribution and created a good news piece.  

Our final video can be found here:

TV NEWS; FINE CUT FEEDBACK

After making the changes to our video that we needed to make after out rough cut feedback from Helen, we had our fine cut feedback session with Helen. From this, there were three main points that came, one positive and two to improve on.
1) Firstly, Helen liked our intro, after changing it completely to include more voiceovers rather than the big long filmed studio links from Joel. We edited studio links way down and made them voiceovers, using a lot more GVS relevant to the words being used

2) Secondly, Helen thought that for our package, our main interviewee Kerri, spoke a bit too much, she would make some very good points that were absolutely perfect for our package, but some of what she said wasn't that relevant.
What We Did - In order to change this, myself and Katie sat and edited Kerris bits down. We did two things to do this, first of all we took the 30 second introduction part (which included the graph on money spent on retail advertising) split it up completely and used to weave in and out of the points that Kerri was making. We felt this worked out a lot better because it in a way backed up what Kerri was saying, giving the audience some context. Secondly, we placed some more GVS in when Kerri was talking, this was because we had to split the clips up to edit her down, therefore there were a few jump cuts, so we had to put more GVS in to cover the jumps. For example we put in a clip of the Debenhams Christmas advert.

3) Lastly, Helen still didn't like our last link with Joel, Rosie was sat in the background and so Helen said we should use some graphics to cover it up and make it look more professional.

What We Did - Aimee tried to create some form of graphic on a trial and error basis, however we felt as a group that it didn't look that great therefore we decided to leave it how it was. With more time perhaps we could have done it but because we only had one proper day of editing until hand in we didn't want to damage our project, so we decided to stick with what we had. 

TV NEWS; ROUGH CUT FEEDBACK

Now that filming on both sections was completed, we began fully editing everything together. Katie took the lead on this, we had the clips on her laptop but we all sat around a big TV (with Katie's laptop plugged into) so we could all cast our opinions and still edit together. Aimee and Katie both began creating the logos and other graphics needed using after effects. Furthermore Laura took the role of creating all of our social media sites - we now have a youtube account, a twitter account and a Facebook.


Feedback - We had a rough cut viewing with Helen where we received some feedback based on our rough cut version on 'Guidance to Finance'
-Joels beginning links is too long, at the moment amounting to about 1 minute and a half it is a bit to informative and too 'wordy'
-The graph that we used to indicate how much companies spend on advertising needs to reference where we got the information from in order to back ourselves up
-Case study; our case study Kerri needs to be built up more, we need to create more of an image as to who Kerri is, who she represents
-Talking about christmas, bring it in earlier, get to the point and express the underlying issue earlier
-Cut down ending



What we did to improve
After receiving our feedback from Helen, we all sat down to organise because we still had a lot to do. Though everything was filmed, we needed to switch everything around in terms of the order within our timeline, as well as organise some extra content. Katie sat there and went through the timeline, we had to be fairly brutal and remove anything that wasn't significant without worrying about timing issues. I sat there and organised our voice overs, Aimee organised for our presenter Joel to come back in and record the voice overs so i sat there creating them. It wasn't too hard as i already had a rough idea of what we needed Joel to say. I just found the main weakness in creating voiceovers was making sure they fit into a certain time frame and obviously i couldn't predict how Joel would say what i had written. We changed around the order and shortened down Joel's beginning links, replacing them with more GVS filmed by all of us, and the voice overs written by myself.

FICTION ADAPTATION; BRIEFING AND WORKSHOP

For our next unit we can choose between one - Fiction Adaptation, or another - Professional Placement. Today we had a workshop with Mike Rhymer and were had an introduction to the fiction adaptation course so that we can make an informed decision to what one we take. We were given a haiku as well as some web links to some stock footage sites and had to create a 30 second video based around and adapted from the Haiku. Myself and Laura worked together and we choose the following Haiku

No one travels
Along this way but I,
This autumn evening.

From this we wanted to show many clips of a city; we wanted to highlight the fact that within big city there are lots and lots of people and to show this we used many different wide and bird eye shots of big city buildings with bright lights and fast cars. However we had one clip of an old man walking alone down a road, we kept cutting back to that to demonstrate how within a big city; people can still be alone and feel lonely.

TV NEWS; SHOOT DAY

On Monday 9th October we had our very first filming day, for this day we had 2 different parts that we wanted to film, this included
1) Joel (Main presenter) opening and closing links filmed behind a green screen)
2) Our 'live' section - an interview between Joel and our credit expert Rosie Evans
We first of all booked out one of the lecture rooms in the base room to use for filming; we thought that would be best because we planned to transform the room into our own little studio set to film in. We arrived at the studios at 7am to set up the room; with our presenter arriving at 9am; we took all of the chairs out of the room and set up the sofas in the corner, Aimee had created some paper logos and we stuck these onto the mugs that we had set up on the set coffee table, something we had seen before in other news/magazine shows such as this morning.


 Furthermore we had already had the other half of the room set up from Friday, we set up the green screen as that is where we would be filming Joel on his main links. Our main issue with this came from being able to light the green screen properly. We hadn't had a lot of experience with this so it was very much a trial and error situation; we used the 650 tungsten lights and just kept repositioning them until we eventually got there.

I think that overall this day of filming went quite well. Something that was new for us with this was having an external person coming in to take part who none of us had met before. Anyone i have used before including Joel we have always known, Rosie Evans who we interviewed as our expert was someone we had sourced ourselves and it was interesting to see how that was; we had to make Rosie feel welcome and looked after but also make sure we got the answers we wanted. When we filmed the live interview between Joel and Rosie i was timing the 2 minutes on my phone whilst the others were on the camera; we soon discovered that 2 minutes went very quick and we only got 2 out of our 6 questions answered; therefore i looked over the questions and condensed them down to three; asking Rosie and Joel if they would mind filming it again so we could get some more content; in the end the second time it worked very well.

Next Steps; Next up for this project was finding a case study - we wanted to put the credit schemes we were talking about into context and create a story around someone who had these problems themselves and how it had effected their lives. We tried multiple ways of contacting people - Aimee and Laura created different posts on Mums net and other social media sites such as Facebook, however we got no response. Finally i managed to find someone through a friend of a friend who was willing to take part if the interview is anomalous because it is such a sensitive subject. We have played around with different ideas on GVS of our case study without showing her face and we are hoping it will work out very well.

TV NEWS; IDEAS FEEDBACK

This week, we had a tutorial with Helen to go over our ideas, cast and locations to make sure everything is running smoothly and planned as it should be. From the feedback session there was two main things that Helen gave us to think about
1) Argos - would it be right for us to film with them? Due to the fact Laura works there, there could be a conflict of interest because we wouldn't be able to be objective in interviewing Argos, for them it is purely a bit of promotion and they would only want to talk positively about their Argos card rather than anything else.
What We've Done About It; Having this discussion with Helen made us realise that perhaps it wasn't the best idea to have an interview with Argos; within our piece we don't want to glorify Argos Credit Cards, something they may want to do therefore there is an extreme conflict of interest. Furthermore, instead of this we are looking for a case study. Someone we can interview and in essence someone we can tell a STORY about. Ideally someone who has or has been in debt, because they will be able to talk objectively and from experience about whether or not credit/store cards are a good thing. 

2) The second issue we had when talking to Helen, was what the issue were trying to deal with in our news piece was. We aren't 100% sure of what the issue is, the problem we are trying to deal with within the piece and what we are actually talking about
What We've Done About it; I looked into some research and the best, most reliable source was the bank of Englands website. From there, we found that on average, people spend an extra £500 a month on in November and December as Christmas preparations get underway; this includes presents, christmas food and alcohol. At the moment we have narrowed the problem down to this; With Christmas starting earlier and earlier every year within shops, and so many finance offers and cards being offered, are people getting into debt too easy?

CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES; WORK

How can you incorporate the impact and implications of media freedom or censorship into your own work?
We can look at how an adaption has changed, for example within a book it is only the written word, therefore they have more 'media freedom' within a book, they can be a lot more explicit because there is less restrictions on what can be written and published, rather than filmed and shown. For example with the Fifty Shade of Grey films, there was a lot of critical response that said a lot of film didn't reflect the true nature of the books

What censorship laws/organisations can you explore with reference to your own research/essay?
Within my own essay I'm not 100% sure on what texts i am going to be looking at for my essay, but at the moment i am doing some research into 13 Reasons Why. With this i could look at some suicide charities and organisations, because within the Netflix programme the main character kills herself, she slits her wrists and the way in which is was filmed including the sounds made, is extremely graphic. From this the critical response that was made was that it was far too graphic for the audience and there were many complaints that it 'glorified' suicide.

What are often the hidden cultural contexts which might impact upon what is possible in terms of both drama and news journalism?
Within 13 Reasons Why, it is set within the 21st century where this is such access to immense technology and social medias, therefore the bullying that takes place within the programme is a lot more intense. Within that, the reason she kills herself is because she believes she has no friends, it could be looked at that without all of the bullying that takes place she may not have thought that and ultimately not killed herself.

What themes can you explore? differences in the written word and moving image?
Within 13 Reasons, i think the main theme to consider will be death; something i think that will be really interesting to look at is how the TV production team managed to translate the death of Hannah, from the written word to the TV screen.

Find sources to utilise and add to your reference list
https://contexts.org/blog/13-reasons-why/
https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2017/apr/26/netflix-13-reasons-why-suicide